• Currently 133564 supporters.
  •   
  • Join
  • Login
  • Generation Why?

    Generation Why?


    Another day, another article that is nothing more than a thinly veiled, misinformed attack on young people.


    http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/thirty-good-job-still-living-at-home-lifes-a-breeze-20120220-1tjl2.html

    It’s the same criticism again and again; that young people are staying home, instead of saving and moving out. That young people are lazy or entitled and would rather party and spend their cash than work hard and be independent. But what this and many articles like it fail to realise is that the workforce and the economy have changed significantly since the parents of these allegedly carefree Generation Y were of a similar age.

    For starters, there is the looming spectre of housing costs - especially house prices. In June 2011 the median house price in Sydney was $595 000, compared to 10 years ago when it was $393, 500. Buying a house on a moderate income has become increasingly difficult and many young people feel that it is beyond their grasp.

    According to the ABS:

    The proportion of homes sold that were affordable to moderate income households declined from 36% in 2003-04 to 27% in 2007-08.  The number of homes sold that were affordable by moderate income households declined from 24 homes per 1,000 moderate income households in 2003-04 to 17 homes per 1,000 households in 2007-08.
    1370.0 - Measures of Australia's Progress, 2010. Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    However, more concerning than not being able to afford to own your home is the increasing insecurity young people are facing at work. The ACTU’s Working Australia Census results show how young people are bearing the brunt of the growth in insecure working arrangements. Of the total Census sample, 14.2% of respondents were working in insecure or non-permanent arrangements and of this group close to a third were aged under 35.

    Of those Census respondents aged under 25, 41.6% were working in some form of non-permanent work, compared to 11.6% for those aged over 35. That means that young workers were close to four times more likely to be in insecure arrangements.

    This increased likelihood of working in non-permanent arrangements has serious flow-on effects for young people. Without permanent ongoing employment, securing a lease becomes more difficult.The Howe Inquiry into Insecure Work now underway has been told securing a car loan is difficult if not impossible for those who do not have job security. There are also a significant health and well-being costs to working in non-permanent arrangements, as one respondent told the ACTU:

    I work in three different casual jobs, two of which are through different labour hire companies. Some weeks I work nearly 60hrs, others only 7.5hrs or not at all. I enjoy construction work, yet local builders only want workers on ABNs which I refuse because it’s illegal and immoral… I might have very slow weeks but I’m exhausted and my health is suffering from the constant stress of uncertainty. I recently injured myself outside of work and have no sick leave. Once I recover I fear that declaring an injury will mean I’m discriminated against when applying for jobs. Queensland is meant to be booming but it certainly isn’t for me.

    One of the most difficult barriers that young people face today is attitude. Combating the views that young people are unreliable, lazy or entitled is extremely difficult. What would be more useful than having yet another article using anecdotes and no evidence to pigeon hole young people, is for some light to be shined on the difficulties facing young people as they struggle to be independent while facing increasingly costs and decreasing security. 

    Rhiannon Carter is ACTU strategic research analyst

    R@W News is a forum for news, analysis and commentary about rights at work and related issues. The opinions presented in R@W News are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent policies or views of the ACTU.

     

    Posted by ACTUadmin on 21/02/2012 2:14:20 PM

4 Comments

  • Cassandra

    21/02/2012 3:24:20 PM

    Yes - and rather than demanding that all political parties seriously address this problem the media would rather direct its full fire power on it own beat up issue of will Kevin Rudd challenge for the leadership of the Parliamentary Labor Party or will / should Julia Gillard sack him?

    Of course addressing the real issues of concern to working (or non working) Australians would draw attention to the total lack of interest in addressing these issues by the Liberal coalition that is only concerned with cutting public expenditure while increasing the profits of its backers.

    Report this

  • public

    21/02/2012 4:39:09 PM

    Well said Cassandra!!

    What's annoying though when you read the article Rhiannon refers to is the assertion that the author 'knows' families with kids still at home and enjoying life. Pity that's not the experience of lots of others. Perhaps the author should've thought harder before implying her experience is the predominant experience.

    Report this

  • public

    22/02/2012 10:18:08 AM

    This response from the ACTU, which does provide actual research data and results (as opposed to that provided by Ms Moore of The Age in her article) is an excellent insight into the realities of today's working environment and the difficulties facing young people; the Age article is nothing more than an attempt to encourage and enforce a stereotype and invoke a knee-jerk reaction that bares little relation to the reality facing young people today. The funny thing is that it wasn't so many years ago that Ms Moore writing for The Age attacked baby boomers, the group she now praises.

    In response to an article written by Ms Moore for The Age in 2005, another writer wrote as follows:

    “Avril Moore, you judge your friends harshly, labeling them "deluded", "terrified", and "in denial". Then you write off all baby boomers as "selfish" and "narcissistic". Try to get out a little more - you could be pleasantly surprised.”

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/Opinion/Teaching-our-kids-about-sex/2005/03/06/1110044249272.html

    It seems that perhaps Ms Moore did get out and has her eyes set on those unfortunate enough in her opinion to have been born in the Gen Y years; I wonder whose next on her hit-list?

    It is a reassuring thought that there are organisations and people out there like the ACTU that are fighting for the rights of young people. Keep up the great work.

    Report this

  • public

    26/02/2012 1:18:51 PM

    It's pretty sad how easy it is to just make up claims about how lazy young people are, and sounds no different to the kind of rubbish I heard when I was a "young person". There is no doubt that young people want to work and that the vast majority of them work hard. Just like everyone else they want a job they can rely on; not just to be at the whim of the management.

    Thank you
    Jonathon, SA

    Report this

Leave comment

 
 
Submit

Recent Blogs

Recent Comments

Recent Comments