• Currently 133564 supporters.
  •   
  • Join
  • Login
  • The WorkChoices zombie is alive!

    The WorkChoices zombie is alive!

    By Tim Petterson


    The Fair Work Act abolished WorkChoices, but there are still some workers for whom it lives on.

    In the dying days of WorkChoices, a small number of employers used the window before the Fair Work Act began to lock their employees into non-union agreements with wages and conditions significantly worse than the award.

    One of those companies is BRI Security, a contractor that provides security to tertiary campuses in Victoria.

    Recently, BRI Security was awarded the contract for the Kangan Institute, a TAFE that has eight campuses in Melbourne and its suburbs.

    Fourteen security guards, some of who have worked at Kangan for more than a decade, now face the invidious choice of accepting pay cuts of up to $12,370 a year with the incoming contractor or find another job.

    Jess Walsh, the Victorian Secretary of the LHMU security union, said the election eve revelations are a timely reminder of the savage cuts in workers’ wages and conditions that took place under the Liberals and why Tony Abbott can’t be trusted on industrial relations.

    “Tony Abbott wants everyone to forget about Work Choices and his passionate support for these harsh and brutal policies,” Walsh said.

    “But these guards cannot forget: their choice is to cop a $13,000 pay cut or find another job, thanks to the policies of Tony Abbott and his hero John Howard.

    “This week a key IR academic revealed that an Abbott government could easily cut wages and conditions, and remove unfair dismissal protections, without changing the law, simply by amending the regulations.

    “This pay cut will have a devastating impact on guards and their families. We are urgently appealing to Kangan Institute to protect the jobs and current pay rate of their loyal and dedicated guards.”

    While Mr Abbott has said he won’t amend Labor’s Fair Work Act in his first term, one of Australia’s leading academic experts on industrial and labour law, Professor Andrew Stewart of the University of Adelaide said this week that the Liberals could "comfortably make radical change" without changing the laws.

    Professor Stewart, who advised the government on the drafting and structure of the laws, said this would allow workers to surrender penalty rates and overtime payments.

    Mr Abbott could also remove the requirement that a company have an objective, valid reason for sacking a worker.

    BRI rammed through its unfair WorkChoices-era agreement in 2007, in the dying days of the Howard government, when it reportedly had just ten workers in Victoria.

    Rapid growth as a cut-price contractor has seen its workforce increase to 300, who are all stuck on this agreement until 2012 when it expires.

    Kangan Institute has campuses at Broadmeadows, Coburg, Essendon, Melbourne CBD, Moreland, Richmond, Craigieburn and Docklands.

    Guards working a rotating shift will see their wages fall from $972 per week to $727.19 with BRI while those on non-rotating shifts face an even bigger wage cut.

    The agreement strips away key Award entitlements including penalty rates and allowances. It also breaches National Employment Standards for redundancy pay.

    Under the Fair Work Act, a new agreement can be made to replace WorkChoices-era non-union agreements, even though the current agreement has not expired.

    But industrial action cannot be taken to support that claim until the old agreement expires.

    ACTU Secretary Jeff Lawrence said it was shameful that under WorkChoices, employers were able to lock workers into these sub-standard deals for many years, with little or no opportunity to escape them.

    But he said workers were now protected from these types of agreements under the Fair Work Act.

    “We know that employers are pushing for a roll back of these protections if the Liberals are elected on Saturday,” Lawrence said.

    “We also know that the Liberals want to wind back unfair dismissal protection, reintroduce individual contracts and cut minimum standards.

    “It’s unacceptable that Australians will vote in a few days time without the Liberals releasing a workplace policy.

    “Tony Abbott and Eric Abetz are treating voters with contempt by refusing to answer basic questions about what they would do if they gained power.

    “Given their track record, working Australians can have absolutely no trust in Tony Abbott and the Liberals.”

    Tim Petterson is Media officer for LHMU Victoria


    R@W News is a forum for news, analysis and commentary about rights at work and related issues. The opinions presented in R@W News are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent policies or views of the ACTU.

     

    Posted by ACTUadmin on 20/08/2010 10:13:29 AM

5 Comments

  • public

    30/08/2010 1:21:46 PM

    Why new election costing another $170 millions people's burden, politician extra pocketing?

    Why not $170 millions to create a national hurray "Health Olympic Australia" project for a truly “Health Revolution” once described Australia health reform by ousted Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.

    A “Health Olympic Australia" project will direct benefits to everyone in Australia within 3 years, for everyone’s health creation, everyone’s wealth creation regardless of gender, age, and or race, then benefit to everyone globally afterward?

    People demands fairer resources supported of lives today, not tomorrow, and not another 3 years on and on?

    There are at least five economic productivity outcomes will resulting significant GDP progressing from a “Health Olympic Australia” as follow:

    1. Reductions in Australian Health Workforce cost;
    2. Reduction in Healthcare cost;
    3. Reduction in lost productivity cost;
    4. Increase from agriculture outcome;
    5. Increase from “Health Olympic Australia” creation in goods/products exportation.

    Australia people will fill the miss opportunity to them should it exist today.

    Ma kee wai
    (Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)

    Report this

  • public

    30/08/2010 4:04:39 PM

    What are you talking about? How has anything you said translate into better health outcomes? How will workers in the health industries be any better off with what you're suggesting??? Sounds like absolute boss rubbish to me.

    Dave

    Report this

  • public

    3/09/2010 1:29:26 PM

    What Australia hung parliament demonstrating deep in voter’s heart?

    Australia citizens now enter a very challenging political era for 70 years in the 2010 federal election, many reforms are demanding by voters are looking for a change with anger to share fairer resources supplied lives from the first term of government?

    Voters handed down their decisive votes during election time are looking for an efficient, effective and economically run government. A high transparency in less mistaken caused processing under no discriminately enforced services government. A long term wealth creative vision with fast action moving forward progressing resulting value add to voters benefits in each term of governing.

    Voters are crying for action right now to have improved resources support lives that suppose lead by a government in the following eight commitments:

    1. What vision of prosperity voters seen?
    2. Why action not enough in the past 3 years?
    3. How many election promises has been fulfilled?
    4. Where productivity motivation to voters?
    5. What materials to speed up election promises processing?
    6. Why some election promises in powerless process?
    7. How far transparency in each department service voters wanted?
    8. Where prioritized direction to empowerment the nation?

    Report this

  • ianf

    3/09/2010 3:04:50 PM

    And what does that have to do with anything? These are issues voters should think about before they vote. And when they have voted they have endless opportunities to get involved to shape their political future. Look at this site, it gives us the opportunity to participate in important campaigns and the discussion around key issues for workers.

    When you start making sense maybe others will engage with what you have to say.

    Report this

  • public

    14/09/2010 10:55:19 AM

    1. What time bombs will rock Australia democratic society?

    The Australia historical hung parliament demonstrated the big gap of inequality society between the small educated elite groups who get highest pay by talk feast used mouth work controlling live essential resources of the country in every social platforms against the biggest less educated groups who get lowest pay by hands work squeezed by discriminative policies that sucking live blood from poor/less wealth off?

    Voters’ voices do not hear?
    Voters’ pains do not ease?
    Voters’ cries do not care?

    1. Poverty will not be phase out if no fairer resources to share;
    2. Illness will not be reducing if no preventive measurement in real action;
    3. Agriculture will not be revitalize if urbanization continuing its path;
    4. Housing affordability will not be reach for young generation if government continues cashing from young generation debt by eating out the whole cake of education export revenue without plough back;
    5. Manufacture industry will shrink smaller and smaller if no new elements there to power up to survive;
    6. Employability will not in the sustainable mode for so long as manufacture and agriculture not going to boost.

    Ma kee wai
    (Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)

    Report this

Leave comment

 
 
Submit

Recent Blogs

Recent Comments

Recent Comments