• Currently 133564 supporters.
  •   
  • Join
  • Login
  • Federal Election 2010: PS policy positions at a glance

    Federal Election 2010: PS policy positions at a glance

    By Nadine Flood



    With less than three weeks to go before voting begins, Australians are looking carefully at what on the major policial parties are offering.

    We have put together a quick chart that compares the public sector policies of the parties most likely to form Government. We have also sought short statements from the Liberal Party, the ALP and the Greens outling their main aims in relation to the issues that matter to CPSU members.

    In their own words


    Prime Minister, Julia Gillard (ALP)
    "A strong and responsible Government improving and protecting the essential public services and basic rights our people depend on, including so importantly, their rights at work." (Canberra Press Conference, 24 June 2010).

    Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott (Liberal Party)
    "We are going to trim the public service by 12,000." (CEDA conference, 22 June) "Not since the era of Fightback under John Hewson has an opposition been prepared to nominate hard cuts to, for instance, public servant numbers." (Macquarie Radio, 29 June 2010).

    At a glance


    Key CPSU Issues

    Coalition position

    Labor position

    APS Staffing Levels 12,000 job cuts over 2 years
    more job losses expected as a result of $45.8b ‘savings’ and program cuts
    no change to overall APS employment
    Moran Review / APS Reform Blueprint discontinue Blueprint, no further details support Blueprint plan to build strong APS with a unified workforce
    Workplace Relations * return to WorkChoices under new name
    * individual contracts
    * fewer rights for members and delegates
    * support role of unions and delegates
    * support streamlining of APS bargaining
    * acknowledge the need to fix APS pay gaps
    Medibank Private sell off keep in public ownership
    Superannuation no increase in employer contribution increase employer contribution: 9% to 12%
    Journey Cover oppose reintroduction of recess and journey cover commitment to reinstate recess coverage
    no commitment on journey cover


    Statements from major parties


    To ensure all CPSU members in the public sector can make an informed choice in the 2010 Federal Election, we invited the major parties to provide a brief statement outlining their public sector policies.

    Liberal Party

    ALP

    Greens

    NO STATEMENT PROVIDED

    Despite several emails and phone calls from the CPSU to the Liberal Party, no statement has been provided.

    Below is our email invitating the Liberal Party to provide a statement.

    From: Kristin van Barneveld (CPSU)
    Sent: Friday, 30 July 2010 4:03 PM
    To: 'reception@chq.liberal.org.au'
    Subject: Liberal Position statement

    Dear Miranda

    As mentioned, Karen Atherton, CPSU National Political Coordinator called your office on Wednesday this week (28/07) asking if the Liberal Party could provide 200 words on their position relating to the Public Service.

    Karen explained that this statement would be put on our website along with a statement from the other 2 major parties.

    We have since received a statement from the Greens and the ALP and these are on our website. We would love to be able to provide our members with a statement from the Liberal Party as well.

    Can you please provide one as soon as possible?

    Thank you.

    Kristin van Barneveld
    CPSU Deputy Secretary
    Federal Labor recognises the enormous efforts of the Australian Public Service and the critical role public servants play in moving Australia forward.

    As technology improves access to government, including the public service and elected representatives, there are increasing demands for greater accountability.

    Our challenge is to ensure the long-term planning is in place to respond to those demands and develop our workforce.

    A Gillard Labor Government is committed to ensuring that the APS is a model employer when it comes to employment conditions, opportunities for advancement and lifelong learning.

    We know there is more work to be done to reform the federal public sector, including its workplace relations.

    There are a number of initiatives already underway to look at these issues, including the Advisory Group on Reform of Australian Government Administration. The Advisory Group's draft blueprint for reform has been delivered to Government.

    The task of developing a framework for ongoing reform and renewal of the APS is aligned with our commitment to ensure the principles of fair work are reflected in its workplace relations arrangements.

    I have said in the past that Federal Labor is interested in streamlining current APS bargaining arrangements.

    If elected, we would consider this in conjunction with the broader public service reform agenda and would work closely with the CPSU and other public sector unions to achieve the ultimate goal of a more efficient and dynamic public sector.

    A Gillard Labor Government has no agenda or plan to cut overall public service numbers.

    In contrast, the Coalition's ill-considered plan to cut 12,000 staff and $3.8 billion from the public service would jeopardise services and threaten APS reform.

    Julia Gillard
    Prime Minister

    More information is available at http://www.labor.org.au/

    The Australian Greens value public servants and the work they do.

    We are committed to maintaining APS staffing levels and oppose the Coalition's proposed cutbacks.

    We understand that job cutbacks will lead to a decrease in the quality of services for the public and that demand for well-informed public policy doesn't reduce if jobs are cut - it increases the workload for existing public servants.

    The Greens consistently and vigorously opposed Work Choices and we were pleased to have played our part in ensuring the passage of the Fair Work legislation.

    We secured important improvements to the Fair Work Bill but we know there is more to do to fully restore the rights of workers and unions, in particular strengthening the rights of delegates.

    We remain committed to improving the Fair Work Act in next parliament.

    We are already on the record supporting the increase in the compulsory superannuation contribution to 12% and to index Commonwealth superannuation pensions to wages rather than CPI.

    We support APS-wide bargaining and implementing the Moran recommendations in consultation with the union.

    The Greens opposed the removal of journey cover by the last government and support its reinstatement.

    A strong Green presence in the Senate is necessary for progressive workplace laws and other policies to become a reality.

    Our full set of policies, including our positions on education, health, aged care, refugees, social services, climate change and the environment can be found at http://www.greens.org.au/

    Senator Rachael Siewert
    Greens IR and APS spokesperson



    Vote for essential public services


    As a CPSU member, you understand how important the public sector is. Every day, you and your workmates care for families, secure our borders, develop public policy and provide valuable advice to the Federal Government. But with continuing uncertainty about the global economy, Australia needs a strong and stable public sector. The outcome of this election will have a profound effect on the shape, size and direction of the Australian Public Service. Please consider your vote carefully.

    CPSU action

    Over the coming weeks, CPSU Executive and delegates will continue to meet with local MPs and candidates to explain our view on a range of issues, including the need for:
    * proper funding for public services and jobs including ABC, SBS and CSIRO
    * genuine negotiations on pay and conditions
    * restoration of fair workers’ compensation rights
    * access and training for workplace delegates.

    What you can do

    * Share this information with workmates, family and friends.
    * Learn more about what parties are proposing for the public sector here.
    * Contact us to get involved in local activities at – rights@cpsu.org.au or call 1300 137 636

    Nadine_GC_MARCH_2010.jpg

    Nadine Flood is the National Secretary of the CPSU


    This post was originally published on the Community and Public Sector Union's website.  The original piece can be found here.





    R@W News is a forum for news, analysis and commentary about rights at work and related issues. The opinions presented in R@W News are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent policies or views of the ACTU.

     

    Posted by ACTUadmin on 3/08/2010 5:00:19 PM

10 Comments

  • public

    4/08/2010 10:13:24 AM

    graet stuff nadine. keep fighting for essential services!

    Report this

  • public

    4/08/2010 8:26:56 PM

    Q why did nick michin apolige in 2006 after workchoices was passed as law to the HR nicole society end of year meeting saying WORKCHOICES did not go far enough .Lets not miss the forest for the tree's

    Report this

  • Cassandra

    5/08/2010 1:20:21 PM

    With all the promises Abbott and Co are making without taking the extra taxes that the mining companies are now willing to pay the only one we can be sure he will keep is the one to slash public sector employment.


    That will mean either a corresponding slash in service delivery or actual services or outsourcing the jobs to the private sector who will then employ non union cheap labour in order to maximise their profits. Either way the community loses.

    Report this

  • ianf

    5/08/2010 8:53:15 PM

    the first jobs to go will be public services as they slash and burn services we need.

    cant forget that anti-worker advocate abetz. he's been silenced since admitting the liberals would tweak the laws. the silence is defening.

    Report this

  • public

    6/08/2010 9:22:46 AM

    I was looking for factual policy info from the 3 parties.
    But your interpretation seems to be biased towards ALP rather than starting pros and cons each party policy.

    Report this

  • ianf

    6/08/2010 12:05:41 PM

    factual policy info? whats the problem? labor and greens wrote a response and the libs haven't even bothered to reply. and we know when the libs say nothing about a policy it means it's a core policy.

    Report this

  • public

    6/08/2010 1:55:36 PM

    Have any of you ever employed anyone?

    Report this

  • stevelawley

    7/08/2010 6:53:32 PM

    This is about slashing jobs and services - the very services we use everyday - what does it matter if we have or haven't employed someone? Abbott's plans to slash different government programs is illustrating his short-sightedness on key economic development and environmental issues.

    More concerning is that the Liberals haven't bothered to send the CPSU a response to their questions. This kind of unwillingness to provide answers and details about policy statements shows they have things to hide and no interest in being honest with Australian voters.

    Report this

  • public

    23/08/2010 1:27:45 PM

    Why Labor threw a second term away?
    People need better resources supported of lives
    A letter regarding “Shaping a Healthy and Wealthy Future for Australia “sent to The Prime Minister Kevin Rudd on 29 October 2009.
    My “Health Olympic Australia” project will not only assist the Australian Government to shape a better health system for Australians but will also improve the general health of Australians. This will put Australia in a strong position for long term wealth generation and prosperity.
    The “Health Olympic Australia” project is based on an experimental trial to prove the success results of “The China Study”.
    “The China Project” is referred “The China Study” outcome , a “survey of death rates for twelve different kinds of cancer in over 2,400 counties and 880 million (96%) of their citizens” conducted jointly by Cornell University, Oxford University, and the Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine over the course of twenty years.
    This will be achieved by Australian grain powder instead of gun powder in response to the calls of the “WHO’s Third World Health Revolution” to provide equal opportunities for everyone to gain his/her health and wealth.
    Prime Minister, the steps that will allow Australia to pioneer in achieves the worlds “Health Economy” is by Australia:
    • Inventing health improvement patterns;
    • Growing high antioxidant healthy grains and plants;
    • Manufacturing high antioxidant healthy grain powder products;
    • Exporting its health improvement knowledge and pattern; and
    • Exporting health improvement resources (including human resources).
    Now that Australia is being led by a progressive Labor government, let’s grasp this “Health Olympic Australia” opportunity to not only shape Australia’s health system, but to improve the health of Australians and the rest of the world. This in turn will allow us to further improve the long term wealth of Australia and the world.
    Prime Minister, this could also be Australia’s best opportunity to simultaneously win a Nobel peace prize and a Nobel Prize for Economics. I urge you to agree to allow this unprecedented project to happen under the leadership your Labor government.
    The highest regards
    Ma kee wai
    (Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)

    Report this

  • public

    18/09/2010 1:15:26 PM

    What democratic societies should learn a lessen from Australia election 2010:
    1. What goodwill of Australia parliamentary reform? Peoples power to ease their pains?
    The Australia historical hung parliament demonstrated the big gap of inequality society between the small educated elite groups who get highest pay by talk feast used mouth work controlling live essential resources of the country in every social platforms against the biggest less educated groups who get lowest pay by hands work squeezed by discriminative policies that sucking live blood from individual poor/less wealth off?

    Voters’ voices do not hear?
    Voters’ pains do not ease?
    Voters’ cries do not care?

    1. Poverty will not be phase out if no fairer resources to share;
    2. Illness will not be reducing if no preventive measurement in real action;
    3. Agriculture will not be revitalize if urbanization continuing its path;
    4. Housing affordability will not be reach for young generation if government continues cashing from young generation debt by eating out the whole cake of education export revenue without plough back;
    5. Manufacture industry will shrink smaller and smaller if no new elements there to power up to survive;
    6. Employability will not in the sustainable mode for so long as manufacture and agriculture not going to boost.

    Ma kee wai
    (Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)

    Report this

Leave comment

 
 
Submit

Recent Blogs

Recent Comments

Recent Comments